N\u00c1VRH NA PROHL\u00c1\u0160EN\u00cd O MAJETKU<\/b><\/p>\n

(\u00a7 260a o. s. \u0159.)<\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Okresn\u00edmu soudu<\/p>\n

v\u00a0\u0160umperku<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00fd:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Milan Heim, bytem \u0160umperk, \u0160enov 35<\/p>\n

Povinn\u00fd:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Luk\u00e1\u0161 Kr\u00e1l, bytem \u0160umperk, Olomouck\u00e1 20<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

N\u00e1vrh opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e9ho na prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed o majetku povinn\u00e9ho<\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

I.<\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Rozsudkem Okresn\u00edho soudu v \u0160umperku ze dne 10. 5. 2004 \u010d.j. 10C 56\/2003\u201330 bylo povinn\u00e9mu ulo\u017eeno zaplatit mi \u010d\u00e1stku 120 000 K\u010d s\u00a010 % \u00farokem od 1. 6. 2003 do zaplacen\u00ed a na n\u00e1kladech \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed 11 000 K\u010d. Povinn\u00fd dosud nic na tuto pohled\u00e1vku nezaplatil.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

II.<\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Zaplacen\u00ed dlu\u017en\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1stky nemohu vym\u00e1hat v\u00fdkonem rozhodnut\u00ed p\u0159ik\u00e1z\u00e1n\u00edm pohled\u00e1vky z \u00fa\u010dtu povinn\u00e9ho u pen\u011b\u017en\u00edho \u00fastavu, nebo\u0165 \u2013 jak vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 ze sd\u011blen\u00ed povinn\u00e9ho podle \u00a7 260 odst. 2, 3 o. s. \u0159. ze dne 10. 6. 2004 ve spise \u010d.j. Nc 10\/2004 Va\u0161eho soudu \u2013 povinn\u00fd nem\u00e1 \u00fa\u010det u banky \u010di jin\u00e9ho pen\u011b\u017en\u00edho \u00fastavu. Abych mohl vym\u00e1hat pohled\u00e1vku v\u00fdkonem rozhodnut\u00ed, je t\u0159eba zjistit majetek povinn\u00e9ho.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

III.<\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Navrhuji proto,<\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

aby soud p\u0159edvolal povinn\u00e9ho a vyzval ho k prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed o majetku.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

V ………………….. dne ………………………<\/p>\n

……………………………<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

N\u00c1VRH NA PROHL\u00c1\u0160EN\u00cd O MAJETKU (\u00a7 260a o. s. \u0159.) \u00a0 Okresn\u00edmu soudu v\u00a0\u0160umperku \u00a0 Opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00fd:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Milan Heim, bytem \u0160umperk, \u0160enov 35 Povinn\u00fd:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Luk\u00e1\u0161 Kr\u00e1l, bytem \u0160umperk, Olomouck\u00e1 20 \u00a0 N\u00e1vrh opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e9ho na prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed o majetku povinn\u00e9ho \u00a0 I. \u00a0 Rozsudkem Okresn\u00edho soudu v \u0160umperku ze dne 10. 5. 2004 \u010d.j. 10C 56\/2003\u201330 bylo povinn\u00e9mu … Pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed textu N\u00e1vrh na prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed o majetku<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[29],"class_list":["post-257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-obcanske-soudni-rizeni","tag-obcanske-soudni-rizeni"],"yoast_head":"\n